Big Oil? Who was right: Me

Yesterday, I posted an article saying the reason for the lack of action on the part of the Obama regime was not because he was in bed with big oil as Palin asserted.

Today we see as reported at Gateway Pundit, that the democrats in congress want to quadruple the taxes on gas. I rest my case.

Sarah 0, Right Guy 1.

Thank you for reading this blog.

The Pot Calling the Tea Kettle Black: Palin Accused Obama of Being in Bed with Big Oil

While Saracuda may have a point, it is almost laughable that she accuses Obama in bed with big oil. Alaska has plentiful oil and such that not only is there no income tax, but a refund from the income from oil. Alaska is big oil, which is fine with me.

"I don't know why the question isn't asked by the mainstream mediaand by others if there's any connection with the contributions made topresident Obama and his administration and the support by the oil companies to the administration," she told Fox News Sunday.

 And she is right. The Lamestream media is in fact ignoring the Obama Regime's role in this disaster. In fact, it's amazing that Bush drew brickbats for being a day late, Obama is at day 34 and has not done a damn thing.

Is he in bed with big oil?

According to Andrew Gully, More than 3.5 million dollars has been given to candidates by BP over the last 20 years, with the largest single donation, 77,051 dollars, going to Obama, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Ok, So is there fire even where there is smoke? The Right Guy has another theory that conspiracy theory buffs will love. Try this on for size: Obama's reticence to do anything is to create a scapegoat of the oil companies, create a straw man argument that they are evil in an effort to further eco-terrorists agenda. Think I am wrong? Where are all the Eco-Weenies crying over the death of the spotted half-brown Louisiana turd bird? We really haven't heard from the eco-terror crowd as they want this to be bad so they can say we told you so and push their agenda. Obama is squarely behind them. The fact that they donated money to him is just foolishness on their part and probably has nothing to do with Obama's reluctance in action. What do you think? Let me know.

Thank you for reading this blog.